Employee monitoring

Tockly vs Hubstaff

Hubstaff is the best-known monitoring-first time tracker: screenshots, keyboard and mouse activity rates, app and URL tracking, GPS, and payroll, sold per seat with a heavy add-on model.

Tockly is work tracking that reads AI activity: every minute scored as hands-on, agent running, steering, or idle. Here is how the two compare, line by line.

At a glance

Feature comparison of Tockly and Hubstaff
CapabilityTocklyHubstaff
Classifies human vs AI-agent minutesEvery minute: hands-on, agent running, steering, or idleNo
Credits time supervising an AI agentReads agent activity directly and credits it as workLow input reads as idle; can be flagged as unusual
ScreenshotsEvery 10 minutes, tied to the minute they captureCapped per tier; stored 6 months at most
Activity trackingInput event counts only, never keys or contentKeyboard and mouse rates drive productivity scores
App and site usageActive app and window titlesGated above Free, capped per tier
Invoicing from tracked timeFree for up to 3 clients, unlimited on ProYes
Free tierFull capture, unlimited activity history1 user, 100 screenshots/mo
Entry price (annual)Free. Pro $12, Team $16 per seat/mo$4.99/seat/mo, 2-seat minimum

Hubstaff details verified against its public pricing and documentation as of July 2026. Products change; check Hubstaff's site for current numbers.

The minute Hubstaff can't see

Hubstaff's entire productivity model is built on keyboard and mouse movement as the proxy for work. When someone kicks off a coding agent and watches it run, their activity score collapses, and Hubstaff's unusual-activity detection can even flag the quiet stretch as suspicious. Its "AI tool usage" reporting only sees that an AI app was open. It cannot say whether the human or the agent was doing the work in any given minute.

An agent-heavy week, scored by input30% active

Agent minutes score as nothing happening.

The same week in Tockly87% engaged

Hands-on, steering, and agent time, each credited for what it is.

Pricing

Tockly

  • Personal: free. Full capture, invoicing for 3 clients, screenshots from this month and last.
  • Pro: $12/seat/mo annual ($15 monthly). Unlimited clients, 12 months of screenshot receipts.
  • Team: $16/seat/mo annual ($20 monthly). Org rollups, roles, per-person AI adoption.

Hubstaff

  • Starter: $4.99/seat/mo annual ($7 monthly). 2-seat minimum, 500 screenshots per seat.
  • Grow: $7.50/seat/mo annual ($9 monthly). 1,500 screenshots and app records per seat.
  • Team: $10/seat/mo annual ($12 monthly). Unlimited screenshots, payroll, approvals.
  • Add-ons stack on Team: Insights $2.50, more screenshots $2.50, GPS $3.33, silent app $2.50. A monitoring-complete seat lands near $18.

Which should you pick?

When Hubstaff is the right call

Pick Hubstaff if you need GPS and geofencing for field teams, built-in payroll across a large org, or a long list of integrations that Tockly does not have yet.

When Tockly is the right call

Pick Tockly if your team works with AI tools. Hubstaff scores work as keyboard and mouse movement, so minutes spent supervising an agent read as idle. Tockly reads agent activity directly and credits those minutes as work, labeled by who was driving.

Frequently asked

Does Hubstaff count time supervising an AI agent as work?

No. Hubstaff measures activity as keyboard and mouse movement rates. While an agent runs and you watch it, input drops, so those minutes score as low activity or idle. Its unusual-activity detection is built to flag exactly that pattern. Tockly reads the agent's own activity feed and classifies those minutes as agent running or steering, both credited as work.

What does Hubstaff actually cost per seat?

The advertised entry is $4.99 per seat per month billed annually, with a 2-seat minimum. The sticker understates it: productivity insights, extra screenshots, GPS, and the silent app are each per-seat add-ons, so a monitoring-complete Team seat is realistically about $18 per seat per month. Tockly Team is $16 per seat per month annual with the AI-work split included, not sold as an add-on.

Is Tockly a good Hubstaff alternative for developers?

Yes, that is the exact case it was built for. Developers using Claude Code or similar tools look idle to Hubstaff during their highest-leverage minutes. Tockly scores every minute as hands-on, agent running, steering, or idle, so AI-assisted work shows up as work with a label saying which kind.

More comparisons

See your own human/agent split today.

Install the app, work a normal day, and the record builds itself, minute by minute.